District of Columbia

From Defending Conservatism Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Democrats have taken over the District of Columbia and are now controlling billions of dollars of federal investment in infrastructure while attempting to misappropriate funds intended for a federal district originally created by Congress to house federal buildings like the White House. The District of Columbia should be federalized and the 1973 Home Rule Act reversed. Rather than allowing the District to elect its own mayor and city council, which can then dictate how federal funds should be spent for a federal district housing the nation's Capitol and its buildings, Congress should reverse the Home Rule Act and require instead that the heads of transit, police, homeless shelters, etc. within D.C. must be appointed either by Congress or the President.

There is currently a major movement by the Democrats to gain full local control over the District of Columbia and remove the right of Congress to intervene in the decision-making of the District that Congress itself created.[1] The movement, made up of at least 58 groups, is spearheaded by D.C. Vote in coordination with the ACLU, NAACP, NARAL, and Planned Parenthood.[2] The District has had numerous liberal laws blocked by Congress in the past related to abortion, marriage, and marijuana use.

Nonetheless, D.C. residents should have a right to vote for members of Congress. This could be achieved by allowing them to hold dual state citizenship, meaning they could be considered residents of Virginia, Maryland, or whichever second state they hold the closest ties to. Otherwise they are being disenfranchised from their Constitutional right to representation.

Historical Background[edit]

Origins[edit]

The 1790 Residence Act approved the creation of a district specifically to house the nation's capitol. This is consistent with Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which specifically authorizes Congress to designate a 10 mile square area to serve as the capitol of the United States. As such, control of the District of Columbia is clearly, per the U.S. Constitution, delegated to Congress.

The city of Washington was founded in 1791 following passage of the 1790 Organic Act. In 1801 Congress formally organized the District of Columbia and placed the entire territory under the exclusive control of the U.S. federal government.[3] Following passage of the 1801 Act, citizens of D.C. were no longer considered residents of either Maryland or Virginia, thus ending their representation in Congress.[4]

Home Rule[edit]

Following the 1973 Home Rule Act, Congress delegated some of its Congressional powers over the District to local government, allowing D.C. to elect its own mayor and city council.

Congressional Right to Block Laws[edit]

Congress did not fully delegate control to the D.C. Mayor and City Council however, and reserves, per the legislation, the right to block any laws passed by the D.C. Council; which power it has exercised several times. The following is quoted from Title VI, Section 602, as a sampling of the many restrictions enacted on the District of Columbia's local government:[5]

Examples[edit]

  • In 1988 Congress voted to block D.C. from using Medicaid funds to cover abortion services. This was repealed in 2009 but reinstated in 2011.[1]
  • In 1992 Congress voted to block D.C.'s Health Care Benefits Expansion Act which allowed registration of homosexuals to register as domestic partners. The block was lifted in 2001.[1]
  • In 1996 Congress voted to block D.C.'s Clean Needle Exchange Program Law. It wasn't until 2007 that the block was lifted.[6]
  • In 1998 Congress voted to block D.C.'s Initiative 59 (Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Initiative of 1998) through the Barr Amendment. After the courts ruled Congress' action was unconstitutional, Congress in 2000 passed an amendment to overturn Initiative 59, which it reversed in 2009, thus allowing D.C.'s medical marijuana law to go into effect.[7]
  • In 2014 Congress voted to block D.C.'s Initiative 71 (Legalization of Possession of Minimal Amounts of Marijuana for Personal Use Act of 2014) by stopping funds from being used to enact laws, rules, or regulations in support of the initiative.[8]

Potential Solutions[edit]

As mentioned, the 1973 Home Rule Act should be revoked. Washington D.C. should not be allowed to hold local elections which give power over federal territory to a few corrupted bureaucrats who have grown obviously corrupt and are misappropriating federal funds as a result.

Nonetheless, D.C. residents should have a right to vote for members of Congress. This could be achieved by allowing them to hold dual state citizenship, meaning they could be considered either residents of Virginia or Maryland, depending on which state they hold the closest ties to. Otherwise they are being disenfranchised from their Constitutional right to representation.

Sources[edit]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 "Ending Congressional Interference." DCVote.
  2. "July 2017 Letter to Congress." D.C. Vote.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Crew, Harvey W.; Webb, William Bensing; Wooldridge, John (1892). "Centennial History of the City of Washington, D. C." p. 103. Dayton, OH: United Brethren Publishing House.
  4. (2006, September 14). "Statement on the subject of The District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act." American Bar Association.
  5. "Title VI: Reservation of Congressional Authority." District of Columbia Home Rule Act.
  6. Goldstein, Avram (1998, December 2). "City Blocks Needle Exchange Effort." Washington Post.
    "Letter to the House on Needle Exchange in D.C. Appropriations Bill." American Civil Liberties Union.
    Almendrala, Anna (2015, September 3). "Washington D.C. Is Proof That Needle Exchanges Save Lives." Huffington Post.
  7. "Democracy Held Hostage." American Civil Liberties Union.
    "Congress Lifts Ban on Medical Marijuana for Nation's Capitol." Americans for Safe Access.
  8. Marijuana Policy Project (2010, July 27). "D.C. Medical Marijuana Law Clears Congressional Hurdle!" MPP Blog.